Libertarian Party Chairman Nicholas Sarwark goes full Social Justice Warrior

If this is not proof of how utterly useless and beyond repair the Libertarian Party is from the standpoint of real libertarianism, i don’t know what is.

A helpful article from @scalzi on how the game of life works.https://t.co/2us49QKMN1

— Nicholas Sarwark (@nsarwark) 17 augustus 2017

By now it should not come as a shock that the Libertarian Party is like fly paper for all sorts of infiltrator ideologues from both the left and the right, as well as political opportunists. Yet somehow it continues to elicit surprise, even from me.

Dummy Austin Petersen makes a case against his own libertarianism

Narcissistic and belligerent toward those not kissing your ass is no way to go through life, son. Especially not if you boast that you are *the* LP candidate that would build bridges and form coalitions (worked well for ya with Steve Deace didn’t it?)

The world wide web does not merely consist of your own propaganda channel “The Libertarian Republic” through which acolytes and sock puppets worship the ground you walk on, and try to take down your much less philosophically dangerous and much more likeable competitors. Note the “World” part in World Wide Web. Thus there are plenty of places where your rhetoric, and performances, can be analyzed. Whether or not through the cultists that do your bidding.

The Cancer of Non-principled “Libertarianism”

Hey, Libertarians: It’s Austin Petersen or Bust in 2016

 

Bust it is. Because if this fawning supporter of Austin Petersen is anything to go by, then Austin Petersen is an imposter and saboteur, and destructive to the libertarian movement and philosophy.

Let’s investigate why.

Austin Petersen (LP) likes the SJW-slur of “racist”

Austin Petersen is a presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party. I have not yet put him to the libertarian test. Maybe i should speed that up since i now have an article involving him.

This article does not really have much to state about Austin Petersen’s political views, aside from bringing attention to the fact that Mr. Petersen seems to be awfully annoyed by the thought crime of political incorrectness. Does one of the presidential candidates for the LP have nothing better to concern himself with than making snarky screeds about right-wing people saying or writing things considered offensive by the commissars of good taste?

Meet Steve Kerbel: Presidential Candidate for the Libertarian Party

Fourth in the series of presidential candidates from the Libertarian Party to be put to the test, is Steve Kerbel. Thus far we have seen two candidates that don’t come close to passing muster, and one candidate that is an excellent candidate. It will be interesting to see how Mr. Kerbel fares.

Meet Jack Robinson Jr.: Presidential Candidate for the Libertarian Party

When I decided to put candidates from the LP for the presidency of the U.S. to the test right here on the website, I assumed it would be reasonably easy to do so. Surely there must be a way for these candidates to state things clearly and efficiently? Not always, unfortunately.

I now realize that the list of LP candidates may include some serious cranks with visions that properly belong in fantasy land, and whom for obvious reasons choose not to get truly specific. What you get is some sort of stream of conciousness from bizarro world that has to be read to be believed.

Meet Darryl Perry: Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party

In terms of promoting himself, Perry kind of starts on the wrong foot. He does this by insinuating that before Rand Paul ended his presidential run, there were two candidates who were consistently promoting ideas of liberty on every issue, every time.

Real libertarians, of course, know that Rand Paul did nothing of the sort. So what does that say about Darryl Perry? We will investigate.

Meet Joy Waymire: Presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party

With elections just around the corner, libertarians such as myself sometimes tend to forget that a bunch of people are also looking to get into the White House under the libertarian ticket; that is to say: as a candidate affiliated to the Libertarian Party.

I tend to forget this, mostly because i tend not to take candidates affiliated to the Libertarian Party very seriously. There is this habit of the LP to attract the kind of people that just don’t seem to grasp the basics of libertarian philosophy.

Sometimes, it gets even worse.