So how long did it take for a movement called “libertarians for Trump” to realize that they are dealing with a politician? What is it about certain libertarians that they simply refuse to accept historical facts about the nature of politicians, and aspiring politicians once they are in power? The phrase “fool me once, shame on you…” does not even apply here, as these libertarians allow themselves to be fooled time and time again. Continue Reading
This isn’t about George Clooney the actor, writer or director. It is about George Clooney the political activist. Therefore, this is the political truth about George Clooney.
Clooney is one of the most popular actors in the world, virtually worshiped by many women. As tends to be the case with Hollywood people with any recognizability, they want to virtue signal their political affiliations and social ideals to the popular culture masses who think that what Hollywood millionaires have to say about the world reflects any kind of real-life, real-world knowledge and experience. Continue Reading
Two brilliant podcasts (except for leftists, of course) by Trump-sympathizing Voluntaryist Stefan Molyneux. One recapping eight horrible years of President Barack Obama. The other about the anti-Trump riots the day of Donald Trump’s inauguration.
If you have the time, it really drives the point home to watch them concurrently.
Contrary to the claims that the “women’s march” on Washington was “spontaneous” and “non-partisan”, itself quite a ludicrous statement when so many “partners” are involved, it turns out the unavoidable leftist oligarch George Soros is heavily involved with a large number of the ‘partners’ involved in the march.
Also, it was clearly an anti-Trump protest, and not some neutral pro-women march. And if that wasn’t enough, partners involved in the march included organizations such as CAIR, which itself has been tied with the Muslim Brotherhood: quite the “feminist” organizations, these. Continue Reading
Politicians always weigh their words, especially presidents. They know very well how every syllable of every word they utter will be analyzed. Whenever a politicians says something, it is therefore very unlikely to be an accidental mistake. When a politician or especially president says something that runs counter to the very narrative people expect him to support, the chance of it being an accidental mistake is even less likely.
Barack Obama has left the White House. No longer is he responsible for the many departments under his command. In other words, he no longer feels any pressure to parrot any particular narrative he doesn’t actually believe in, for the “common good.” Continue Reading
Intimidation, demonization, violence, riots, destruction… These are behaviors that – in the political sense – tend to be indulged in overwhelmingly by the left. Psychologically, the left is incapable of dealing with political setbacks; of simply not getting their way. This despite constantly promoting the virtues of “diversity,” “tolerance,” and “dialogue.” Continue Reading
Only a couple of weeks before Donald Trump takes a 4 year seat in the White House. Yet we are to wonder if nothing cataclysmic will happen before that happens, as, despite Trump’s promises to strengthen ties with Russia, the United States has now sent 100s of tanks and trucks to Eastern Europe, close to the Russian border, allegedly to “protect” the area from a “Crimean-style annexation.”
Never mind the referendum in Crimea that clearly showed inhabitants’ support for ties with Russia after a Russia-hostile coup took place in Kiev. Never mind that such a situation does not even apply in the smallest degree to any other country in Europe. Never mind that it will only be a few weeks before Donald Trump will take over the reigns from Obama. This all smacks of something sinister happening. Will we see an “incident” occurring just before Trump takes over, that would serve as an excuse for genuine conflict? To potentially force Trump to accept “reality” of a conflict between the U.S. and Russia and thus sabotage his intentions for peaceful relations? Continue Reading
After pushing the Fake News that Russia ‘hacked’ the DNC and influenced the outcome of the elections, the Washington Post, one of many MSM outlets decrying “fake news” coming out of the internet, is back to once again pushing its own Fake News.
The Russians are at it again. According to this rag and their usual ~Unnamed “senior administration officials”~ (which we must now regard as indicator number 1 of a story being fake news until solid evidence turns up of its veracity) Russians how now allegedly “hacked” the state of Vermont’s electric grid system. Continue Reading
Finally, the “intelligence community” has released a full report of alleged Russian “hacking” of the DNC, in order to influence the U.S. presidential elections.
And it managed to have 25 pages of absolutely NO PROOF whatsoever. Only mere assertions. Words like “we are confident” and “judge” are rampant, yet anyone with half a brain knows what this really means.
To have evidence is to “know for a fact”. To have mere suspicions, or worse, mere assertions, is to be “confident” and to “judge”. Why are they confident? Why are they not SURE? Because they have clearly not found any actual evidence. This being the U.S. intelligence agencies of CIA, FBI and NSA, this should speak volumes. Between the three of them they could not find any solid evidence. Could it be because it is not there to begin with? Continue Reading