Obviously i’m not going to report on every single ideological politics related violence that is reported on. But suffice it to say most of not all of it has the common denominator that it reports the hardcore left for the violent, totalitarian thugs they really are under their thin facade of “tolerance” and “diversity.”
One instance i hadn’t made a post about were the violent riots at UC Berkeley to stop Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking. Think for a single second: these are “students” who use violence, riots and destruction to protest a fucking speech! By a gay, conservative political speaker and activist and writer. At a college, the institution which is supposed to be about intellectual freedom and inquiry. Continue Reading
Contrary to the claims that the “women’s march” on Washington was “spontaneous” and “non-partisan”, itself quite a ludicrous statement when so many “partners” are involved, it turns out the unavoidable leftist oligarch George Soros is heavily involved with a large number of the ‘partners’ involved in the march.
Also, it was clearly an anti-Trump protest, and not some neutral pro-women march. And if that wasn’t enough, partners involved in the march included organizations such as CAIR, which itself has been tied with the Muslim Brotherhood: quite the “feminist” organizations, these. Continue Reading
Now, of course men need not worry. This candidate for a full lobotomy will not actually do anything except play a psychopath on your internet screen.
But here is the thing about cultural marxism: it combines the right to abortion (which in itself is a right i think people have), to this kind of unhinged depravity (radical feminism) and what you will eventually have is ideology based abortions (kill all male babies). Continue Reading
In a Twitter battle between myself and several other Anarcho-Capitalists, several arguments have been exchanged that serve either to justify concepts such as “open borders”, “freedom of movement” or “mass immigration, or to reject them from a libertarian point of view.
I will present some of these here, and may present more in the future. Suffice it to say that i was very unimpressed by the arguments in favor of “freedom of movement.” Continue Reading
Yes that’s right, white-knighting, politically correct, gender-feminist hippie. You don’t have a right to that hair style because that hair style belongs to people of color. Such micro-aggressiveness.
Leftist lunatics getting into a pushing and pulling match over dread locks.I suspect dozens of people will be hiding in their safe spaces tonight.
Where’s the pop corn?
Austin Petersen is a presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party. I have not yet put him to the libertarian test. Maybe i should speed that up since i now have an article involving him.
This article does not really have much to state about Austin Petersen’s political views, aside from bringing attention to the fact that Mr. Petersen seems to be awfully annoyed by the thought crime of political incorrectness. Does one of the presidential candidates for the LP have nothing better to concern himself with than making snarky screeds about right-wing people saying or writing things considered offensive by the commissars of good taste? Continue Reading
Assault on an activist for peace.
Isn’t it wonderfully Orwellian? So-called ‘anti-fascist’ scum, too chicken shit to show their real faces, use sickening aggression against a proponent of non-violence like Lauren Southern by – apparently – throwing piss on her.
I don’t know when and where it started exactly: this notion that in order to be an ‘anti-fascist’ one would have to resort to intimidation tactics, vandalism, censorship and aggression against those merely trying to demonstrate peacefully, or having a civil conversation or interview. In this brave new world of anti-fascism, differences of opinion on social issues are regarded as expressions of “fascism” that deserve to be stopped with violence. Continue Reading
Anarchist Notebook explains why narcissists despise libertarianism and love the state. Narcissism is of course a deep pathological insecurity masked by an deeply arrogant face and pretense of self-assuredness.
This deep pathological insecurity would render narcissists virtually defenseless in a society where the state cannot help them at the expense of those who have more, are more successful, richer, more talented, stronger, better or more intelligent. The notion that their own shortcomings would be brutally exposed in a free society, where people around them are not forced to cater to them and their views, has them tremble in fear.
If only the rejection of this pathetic political correctness in Hollywood would become more widespread. The famous movie writer/director duo Joel and Ethan Coen did not say anything all that inflammatory. They are not against more diversity in the movie industry. But this specific singling out of the Academy Awards nominees, and of specific movies is ‘idiotic’ to them. Don’t hail Caesar; hail the Coen Brothers.
Of course, there is plenty of diversity in the movie industry in general already. Movies are chock full of minorities, and the whiny race-baiting hypocrite Will Smith (who, ironically, was nominated for an Oscar twice and lost, BOTH times to another black actor; how is that for lack of racial diversity at the Oscars?) has not become a movie superstar for no reason. The same goes for people like Eddie Murphy, Samuel L. Jackson, or Morgan Freeman to name but a few examples. Obviously they have gotten plenty of work. The less said about the number of women or Jews in movies the better because any notion of a lack of diversity there is absurd on its face. Even animals get a lot of screen time. Just think about all the movies prominently featuring dogs.
As the Coen brothers point out, the roles the black actors are asked for depends on the stories. And the stories, including the writing of the characters, may not always be up to Oscar “standard” (whatever that may be these days). Obviously, plenty of movies dealing with issues of racism and/or slavery have been nominated (everybody is still rolling their eyes that “Crash” won the best picture award years back instead of the other minority group appeal movie “Brokeback Mountain”). Are we supposed to be buried under mountains more movies about racism or slavery? About life in the hood? Because ironically, these types of movies that appeal to the plight of oppressed or poor black people make for good Oscar-bait.
Not enough eh?
Maybe a good idea would be for Hollywood in general to then get past the umpteenth high profile, Oscar bait movie about racism, ghetto life or slavery, so the people nominating actors for their performances can be impressed by what other meaty roles Hollywood has to offer to black actors (or other minorities)? You know, something about acting range and all that? About diversity not only of color, gender or sexuality, but of the type of movies made? The type of stories told? The type of roles played?
But that would require them to come up with stories that are not about hypocritically lecturing people from a soapbox.
Just in case some may wonder why libertarians such as myself are so vehemently opposed to feminism as possibly evidenced by articles published here.
1: Feminism is supremely collectivistic in its supposed nature; it regards women in general as being part of a group with its own group interests, vis a vis the group “men” and the group interests of ”men”. Libertarians proper regard people as unique individuals and as such represents the interests of individuals against any imposition from groups or group interests. Politically and legally speaking, Individualists judge individuals on their merits; not on their gender. Because feminists aspire to milk differences between the sexes politically and legally, they are sex baiters who do nothing but create greater schisms between the sexes.
2: Feminism, regardless of some deluded souls believing otherwise, is not about ”equality” of the sexes. It does not aim for equality before the law. There is a large abundance of evidence from words, actions or deliberate omissions of such that it aims for advantages for women as opposed to men (think about affirmative action for instance, or pregnancy leave while simultaneously demanding equal pay). It is also evidenced by the virtually complete lack of outrage at non-Western patriarchical societies and generally most or all non-Western violence toward women or oppression of women, all of which are much much worse than whatever can be found in the West. A “rape culture” truly exists in several Middle Eastern countries, but not in the West where rape is justifiably condemned both morally and legally in the harshest terms. Feminism in practice comes down to misandry. Covertly, it is a specialized branch of cultural marxism, which for obvious reasons has absolutely nothing to do with libertarianism.