Read the story of Donna Hylton here.
Via Twitter, on a Reddit forum, I stumbled over this horrifying story: Donna Hylton, a woman who spent time in prison for participating in the kidnapping, rape, murder, and ransoming of a gay man, spoke at the Women’s March as an advocate for women of color.
After so many, yet another blatant example of the left embracing outright criminals or those who would oppress women. Terrorist threats from celebrities, celebrities implying the president is into incest, embracing Islam and women who are pro-Sharia, using innocent children as political pawns, and now a homophobic criminal who was in jail for taking part in a kidnapping, rape, torture and murder of a gay man.
If this does not expose the vile nature of the cultural marxist left and its supposed “morality”, i don’t know what does.
P.S. for repugnant Hollywood celebs: Rosario Dawson has decided she wants to play “activist” Donna Hylton in a film based on Hylton’s own memoirs. Three guesses as to how self-critical this screenplay/film would be about her crime. Dawson has no reason not to know about this crime either, so consciously wants to play a rapist, torturer, murderer while likely minimizing or even ignoring the crime. Rosario Dawson, of course, is yet another far-leftist so this should not be a surprise.
Of course, to a certain degree an alliance between the left and Islam has been the reality for quite some time. But it certainly seems to become ever more blatant, to the point where they are not so much bound by having the same opposition (the enemy of my enemy is my friend), as they are in their own shared goals. We already know that the “Women’s March” was organized by, among others, a muslim women who is pro-Sharia law and has had ties with Hamas.
But it could have been argued that many protester simply were unaware of the ties of radical muslims to the Women’s march.
No more. Continue Reading
Finally, some citizens showing they have had enough of the scum trying to blockade the comings and goings of everyday life with their whiny little marxist protests. It is generally a good thing not to try to escalate a situation unnecessarily. But at some moment the point is reached where people have a right to resist the thuggish behavior of morons hiding behind masks trying to physically hinder people from doing what they want to do. Continue Reading
Two brilliant podcasts (except for leftists, of course) by Trump-sympathizing Voluntaryist Stefan Molyneux. One recapping eight horrible years of President Barack Obama. The other about the anti-Trump riots the day of Donald Trump’s inauguration.
If you have the time, it really drives the point home to watch them concurrently.
Contrary to the claims that the “women’s march” on Washington was “spontaneous” and “non-partisan”, itself quite a ludicrous statement when so many “partners” are involved, it turns out the unavoidable leftist oligarch George Soros is heavily involved with a large number of the ‘partners’ involved in the march.
Also, it was clearly an anti-Trump protest, and not some neutral pro-women march. And if that wasn’t enough, partners involved in the march included organizations such as CAIR, which itself has been tied with the Muslim Brotherhood: quite the “feminist” organizations, these. Continue Reading
Take a look at the video below. Take note of the pure hatred, the propaganda, the attempts at assault, the lies and generally the atmosphere of large conflict that is being created.
It wouldn’t be the first time Antiwar.org’s Justin Raimondo expresses naivety. He had previously supported Rand Paul, called all those libertarians who suspected Rand of being phony “purists”, and members of a “sect”, but finally had to distance himself from the younger Paul. Not that this led to any self-reflection on Raimondo’s part because he managed to still vilify “purists” while admitting Rand Paul was not worthy of a libertarian vote. Nevermind that many of those who saw through Rand Paul actually supported Ron Paul’s for the presidency.
Of course, Ron was principled and consistent and Rand proved almost from the start that he wasn’t. This was no problem for Raimondo, at least not until Rand was unprincipled in the ways that Raimondo himself could no longer accept. Does this not make Raimondo himself a “purist” on matters of foreign policy? Of course it does, because every libertarian has his limits and draws the line somewhere, and Raimondo draws his around war and interventionism. To suggest that the line ought to be there and nowhere else is a purist position in itself.
But never mind that. Justin Raimondo’s naivety apparently goes farther. So far, in fact, that he is actually surprised that Bernie Sanders, a leftist, would condone or even support aggressive and disruptive actions by his supporters at a Donald Trump rally.