As if the entertainment industry is not already suffering from its abundance of eggheads and dullards, here is yet another example of what happens when already stupid (and narcissistic) people from that sector decide to go “full retard.”
You know why it’s “confusing,” Jennifer? Because you’re f**cking STUPID. That’s why. Too stupid to realize that your crap doesn’t smell and therefore that your political opinions are utterly irrelevant to 99,9% of the American population (the remaining 0,9% that thinks your political opinion has merit merely by virtue of you being a celebrity, is even more stupid than you are). You’re stupid to think that outside of the collectively maintained Social Justice Warrior bubble in your industry, people must agree with you, because everyone around you in your bubble does.
So now you think “mother nature” (a typically leftist anthropomorphism of nature or the climate) punished America for Trump?
You now went full retard, Jennifer. Never go full retard.
A blogger over at Creative Deduction makes very clear why libertarians ought to leave virtue signalling to the left. It is advise that would especially serve the weak-kneed lillies over at organizations like Reason, Cato and others that try to play footie with mainstream progressive sentiment in order to come across as “reasonable” (hint: libertarianism will never be regarded as reasonable by inveterate statists of the left and right, no matter how politically correct you are.)
So how long did it take for a movement called “libertarians for Trump” to realize that they are dealing with a politician? What is it about certain libertarians that they simply refuse to accept historical facts about the nature of politicians, and aspiring politicians once they are in power? The phrase “fool me once, shame on you…” does not even apply here, as these libertarians allow themselves to be fooled time and time again. Continue Reading
This isn’t about George Clooney the actor, writer or director. It is about George Clooney the political activist. Therefore, this is the political truth about George Clooney.
Clooney is one of the most popular actors in the world, virtually worshiped by many women. As tends to be the case with Hollywood people with any recognizability, they want to virtue signal their political affiliations and social ideals to the popular culture masses who think that what Hollywood millionaires have to say about the world reflects any kind of real-life, real-world knowledge and experience. Continue Reading
On Lew Rockwell, Jack Perry had this to say about the actions of Trump thus far:
I’ve tried to give Trump the benefit of the doubt and have applauded some of his actions. However, I can’t do that anymore. What I’m seeing is the same thing I couldn’t abide about Obama: The executive order dictatorship. We have invested the president with the power of passing policy without the proper actions of Congress and Senate. Mark my words, this is going to bite all of us. What, he sends an executive order telling SecDef to hand him the wish list of military spending? Ships, planes, and other weapons they want? Oh, I’m sure this is going to cost us, too.
Sorry, readers, I cannot support this man in good conscience. I am seeing the same executive order end-runs around due process of law that Obama did. Again, we are headed into tyranny with this. One man is not supposed to have this kind of power. I didn’t agree with Obama doing it and I’m darn sure not going to be a hypocrite and support Trump doing it, no matter what reasons are given. So, that said, I cannot support this man. What he’s doing is not right.
Now, it is certainly possible to criticize the very specific ends that Trump is looking to reach with the means of executive actions. But is Jack Perry REALLY suggesting that executive action as a means is intolerable no matter the ends? Continue Reading
Two brilliant podcasts (except for leftists, of course) by Trump-sympathizing Voluntaryist Stefan Molyneux. One recapping eight horrible years of President Barack Obama. The other about the anti-Trump riots the day of Donald Trump’s inauguration.
If you have the time, it really drives the point home to watch them concurrently.
Politicians always weigh their words, especially presidents. They know very well how every syllable of every word they utter will be analyzed. Whenever a politicians says something, it is therefore very unlikely to be an accidental mistake. When a politician or especially president says something that runs counter to the very narrative people expect him to support, the chance of it being an accidental mistake is even less likely.
Barack Obama has left the White House. No longer is he responsible for the many departments under his command. In other words, he no longer feels any pressure to parrot any particular narrative he doesn’t actually believe in, for the “common good.” Continue Reading
Intimidation, demonization, violence, riots, destruction… These are behaviors that – in the political sense – tend to be indulged in overwhelmingly by the left. Psychologically, the left is incapable of dealing with political setbacks; of simply not getting their way. This despite constantly promoting the virtues of “diversity,” “tolerance,” and “dialogue.” Continue Reading
Finally, the “intelligence community” has released a full report of alleged Russian “hacking” of the DNC, in order to influence the U.S. presidential elections.
And it managed to have 25 pages of absolutely NO PROOF whatsoever. Only mere assertions. Words like “we are confident” and “judge” are rampant, yet anyone with half a brain knows what this really means.
To have evidence is to “know for a fact”. To have mere suspicions, or worse, mere assertions, is to be “confident” and to “judge”. Why are they confident? Why are they not SURE? Because they have clearly not found any actual evidence. This being the U.S. intelligence agencies of CIA, FBI and NSA, this should speak volumes. Between the three of them they could not find any solid evidence. Could it be because it is not there to begin with? Continue Reading
A very good article deals with how the media voluntarily helps government and the CIA declare any dissenting views or investigative journalism that deviates from the elite narrative to be a “conspiracy theory.”
How ironic it is that a massive “conspiracy theory” is now undertaken by the governments, the CIA and the MSM about how Russia is responsible for the election loss of Hillary Clinton. The author of the piece explains why this, more than anything, is much more likely to be an actual conspiracy theory. Continue Reading