Finally, the “intelligence community” has released a full report of alleged Russian “hacking” of the DNC, in order to influence the U.S. presidential elections.
And it managed to have 25 pages of absolutely NO PROOF whatsoever. Only mere assertions. Words like “we are confident” and “judge” are rampant, yet anyone with half a brain knows what this really means.
To have evidence is to “know for a fact”. To have mere suspicions, or worse, mere assertions, is to be “confident” and to “judge”. Why are they confident? Why are they not SURE? Because they have clearly not found any actual evidence. This being the U.S. intelligence agencies of CIA, FBI and NSA, this should speak volumes. Between the three of them they could not find any solid evidence. Could it be because it is not there to begin with?
It should also be noted how they continually use phrasing that boils down to “denigrate Secretary Clinton” and “discrediting Secretary Clinton”. Of course, Russia, even if it did hack the DNC through Wikileaks, did no such thing. Hillary Clinton denigrated and discredited herself by engaging in all these corrupt and dirty shenanigans that the leak/hack revealed. If she hadn’t, no leak/hack would have revealed the extent of her involvement in situations that don’t stand the light of day. The agencies, therefore, are making excuses for Hillary Clinton’s behavior, by boldly asserting in so many words that a candidate as dirty and corrupt as she was, should have had an honest shot at becoming the most powerful person in the world. Fuck the facts on one of the candidates. She has a right to a reputation that is completely false and unearned. This is the message the CIA, FBI and NSA are sending.
Remind me: exactly how are elections “fair” when at least one of the candidates is hiding so much corruption from the general public, and so many ways in which they are being manipulated, for instance by a completely servile mainstream media that the leaks proved were totally in the tank for Clinton?
The only thing this proves, is that these agencies are in the tank for establishment politicians with closets full of skeletons that they think the public has no right to know about. The public actually is supposed to depend on these agencies for the truth and for justice, yet here they are making a ridiculous case for secrecy. Of course, they include a dirty little judgment on Wikileaks by claiming their authenticity is “self-proclaimed.”Which is funny. There has been a record of absolute 100% authenticity for Wikileaks thus far. It’s not that difficult to understand, since they release official documents and therefore do not forge or falsify anything. With their choice of words, it is clear that they (the intelligence community) clearly do not serve the public, but the state.
All of this, of course, serves to actually distract the public from the real issue: Hillary Clinton’s corruption. Already we can ask the question: whom are still talking about the content of what has been revealed about Hillary Clinton, thanks to Wikileaks and to Project Veritas? Instead, the national debate has conveniently shifted to Russia as the new enemy, for alegedly revealing these facts about Clinton. “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” We are in an age where billions of people are expected to ignore the true nature of a United States presidential candidate, because the truth about her has been exposed by people outside of the country, as if the latter is the real affront.
Personally speaking, i only WISH foreigners would relentlessly reveal facts about my own country’s politicians if they don’t stand the light of day. I actually want to know what kind of people i may be voting for. I actually want to know what they are hiding from me in order to attain power. I want to know in which ways they are setting out to screw me.
We are not only buried under an avalanche of fake news by the mainstream media. We are also dealing with fake agencies for “truth and justice”.