In a fit of honesty, Hillary Clinton could have said the following in private circles:
“I’ve lost the elections because the whole country wasn’t behind me and kissing my dimpled arse. I’ve lost especially because there have been individuals and organizations that have revealed me to be a corrupt witch that has privately asked a large number of mainstream media reporters for cooperation, for the purpose of achieving victory; cooperation which she subsequently received, for instantly by being given debate questions ahead of time.
Yes, of course this means that these mainstream media reporters have basically manipulated the elections and tried help rigging the outcome, and as such have also delivered “fake news”. But it’s important to remember that when the fake news is being created by people on our own team, by mainstream left-leaning reporters willing to give me a helping hand, it is not really fake news. Because we are the ones deciding what is fake news and what isn’t. And it’s fake news when it is against my agenda, and it’s not fake news when it helps me. Fake news is only fake when it comes from sources I can’t bribe or otherwise get to serve my needs, like independent people on alternative media.
I have, in other words, lost the elections because they have managed to prove just how underhanded and corrupt and dirty the tricks are that I pull in order to win elections. And this is unacceptable. A corrupt hag like myself should be able to play her scummy games without disturbance and without being unmasked. It is simply UNFAIR that people have managed to prove what kind of candidate I really am.
And because I have had basically almost the entire MSM in my pocket (including my non-American friends in media), only an independent foreign organization like Wikileaks could have exposed me. But this is highly unfair, simply because they are foreigners. How dare foreigners expose the lies if a candidate like myself who likes sticking her big fat nose in the business of legions of other countries? They ought to mind their own business. They have interjected themselves in American processes.
Sure, the United States interferes in other nations’ domestic issues on an almost daily basis, like those of countries in the Middle East, countries in Africa, countries in Asia, countries of Central or South America, or with Ukraine. Sure, it manipulates or sabotages the elections or governments of a plentitude of other countries through secret CIA operations, like it for instance did by toppling the Chilean leader Salvatore Allende, or with toppling the Iranian leader Mossadeqh. And sure, the CIA has lied through its rotten teeth that Saddam Hussain had weapons of mass destruction, and used this lie as a justification for a bloody invasion and war. And sure, the mainstream media has delivered fake news for years on end by parroting, without question, this blatant CIA lie.
But that is different, because these have been lies approved of by us. But now other nations may have been sticking their noses in our business, so that is entirely unfair. How dare they?
Now I’ve lost and that is unacceptable, because I am Hillary Clinton; I am a Democrat; I am a woman and it was my turn to have all the power. That is my privilege. It’s my right.
Time for the CIA, itself continually trying to undermine the domestic affairs of foreign governments, to claim without bringing forth any evidence, that a foreign nation is sticking its nose in our business, and that this means the elections are not proper.
Even if all anybody has really done, is simply to expose the truth about how corrupt I really am, and how almost the entire MSM was my personal team of cheerleaders. Sure, they could never have done this if I hadn’t been a corrupt witch, and if we had an actually neutral MSM, in the first place, but that is semantics. What is the world coming to if a presidential candidate cannot play dirty corrupt games in order to win an election, without the possibility of the truth coming out?
This is a really, really important issue. Because things as they are, our great plans may have been ruined. Our plans to further stoke the flames of conflict with Russia, in order to provoke or instigate (if they are too stubborn to start things on their end) a war that will enable us to give our loyal friends in the military industrial complex their much-needed new billion dollar contracts, to whip up new hysteria and fear that would enable us to pass yet more “acts” by which we can further erode constitutional and other liberties on the domestic front, and not to mention enlarging our geopolitical power by turning half or more of the world against Russia.
Sure, we can diplomatically attack Russia for invading Crimea after we stuck our noses in Ukraine’s business and helped stage a revolt that is extremely hostile to Russia. Even though invading nations (with the invaluable help from our loyal European friends) to change their internal politics is a trick the United States has perfected not just with neighboring countries but with countries on the other side of the world, but this tactic only takes us so far. But this tactic will only go so far.
And that is why I’ve lost. Because of Russia. Because of people that have exposed us all (me, the DNC and the MSM) as vomit-inducing hypocrites. Because of people that prefer diplomacy and deal-making over yet another war. Because of an organization that won’t let leaders like myself get away with everything. Waaaahhh…”
In related news, the electoral college that was blasted by the left as unfair not too long ago (Hillary won the popular vote), is now magically seen as a last avenue of hope in abolishing Trump’s victory. Oh how things become useful once they can benefit you.
For a further lesson in hypocrisy:
Twenty years ago, TIME Magazine exclusively reported on the feats of American political consultants who’d managed — much to the joy of the United States government — to ensure Boris Yeltsin won re-election to the Russian presidency.
With the official narrative coming from the Obama administration, indeed, the president himself, that the Russians stand guilty of hacking the presidential election of 2016, many are left scratching their heads in disbelief that the only government found to be hacking a state election systems, thus far, is DHS.
“A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they ‘know the individuals’ involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks.